|
|
|
@@ -172,19 +172,3 @@ |
|
|
|
Both options are not ideal, the first one does not allow a simple basic model and the second approach redoes work. |
|
|
|
The advantage of starting with 3D is that allows for a continuous development of one model, instead of switching the complete model. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Prototype Construction} |
|
|
|
Together with the physics model there will be a solid 3D CAD model. |
|
|
|
The CAD model helps to check with dimensions and possible collisions of objects. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a full dynamics model in 20-sim, the next step was to design the system in OpenSCAD. |
|
|
|
Although 20-sim has a 3D editor, it is significantly easier to build components with OpenSCAD. |
|
|
|
Furthermore, for prototyping the OpenSCAD objects can be exported for 3D printing. |
|
|
|
The model made it possible to check component clearance and get an idea of size. |
|
|
|
The model is shown in \autoref{fig:scad_carriage}. |
|
|
|
\begin{figure} |
|
|
|
\centering |
|
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{graphics/scad_carriage.png} |
|
|
|
\caption{Rendered 3D model of the SCARA} |
|
|
|
\label{fig:scad_carriage} |
|
|
|
\end{figure} |
|
|
|
|
