From 420f0809358e9e6f831a78e1ddca84e9f91708de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wouter Horlings Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:51:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fixup! fixup! Update second cycle section --- content/case_experiment_scara.tex | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/case_experiment_scara.tex b/content/case_experiment_scara.tex index 276ed9d..1e2fce8 100644 --- a/content/case_experiment_scara.tex +++ b/content/case_experiment_scara.tex @@ -172,19 +172,3 @@ Both options are not ideal, the first one does not allow a simple basic model and the second approach redoes work. The advantage of starting with 3D is that allows for a continuous development of one model, instead of switching the complete model. - \subsection{Prototype Construction} - Together with the physics model there will be a solid 3D CAD model. - The CAD model helps to check with dimensions and possible collisions of objects. - - With a full dynamics model in 20-sim, the next step was to design the system in OpenSCAD. - Although 20-sim has a 3D editor, it is significantly easier to build components with OpenSCAD. - Furthermore, for prototyping the OpenSCAD objects can be exported for 3D printing. - The model made it possible to check component clearance and get an idea of size. - The model is shown in \autoref{fig:scad_carriage}. - \begin{figure} - \centering - \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{graphics/scad_carriage.png} - \caption{Rendered 3D model of the SCARA} - \label{fig:scad_carriage} - \end{figure} -