| @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||||
| \section{results} | \section{results} | ||||
| \subsection{Overall ROC} | \subsection{Overall ROC} | ||||
| The overall ROC can be found in Figure \ref{fig:overallROC}. With a false acceptance rate of 0,05, The recognition performance is above 99,88\% | |||||
| The overall ROC can be found in Figure \ref{fig:overallROC}. With a false acceptance rate of 0,05, The overall recognition performance is above 99,88\% | |||||
| \begin{figure}[ht] | \begin{figure}[ht] | ||||
| \centering | \centering | ||||
| \includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{image/final_ROC_log} | \includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{image/final_ROC_log} | ||||
| @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ The overall ROC can be found in Figure \ref{fig:overallROC}. With a false accept | |||||
| \caption{A perfect ROC} | \caption{A perfect ROC} | ||||
| \label{fig:nd1S04934_ROC} | \label{fig:nd1S04934_ROC} | ||||
| \end{figure} | \end{figure} | ||||
| Not all ROC’s are perfect. In Figure \ref{fig:nd1S04341_ROC} is the ROC of subject nd1S04341. This deviation is caused by one matching score of zero. In figure \ref{fig:nd1S04341} are the corresponding pictures. The main difference between this pictures is the visibility of the ears. | |||||
| Not all ROC’s are perfect. In Figure \ref{fig:nd1S04341_ROC} is the ROC of subject nd1S04341. This deviation is caused by one matching score of zero. In figure \ref{fig:nd1S04341} are the corresponding pictures. The main difference between this pictures is the visibility of the ears, further are there no significate difference. | |||||
| \begin{figure}[ht] | \begin{figure}[ht] | ||||
| \centering | \centering | ||||
| \includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{image/nd1S04341_ROC} | \includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{image/nd1S04341_ROC} | ||||
| @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Not all ROC’s are perfect. In Figure \ref{fig:nd1S04341_ROC} is the ROC of sub | |||||
| \caption{Pictures of subject nd1S04341} | \caption{Pictures of subject nd1S04341} | ||||
| \label{fig:nd1S04341} | \label{fig:nd1S04341} | ||||
| \end{figure} | \end{figure} | ||||
| Another interesting result is the visibility of the face. In Figure 6 is the ROC of subject nd1S04406. There are a few genuine which a relative low. One of these matching scores in the matching score between the pictures in Figure 6. There are a few differences between these pictures. The first is the visibility of the left part of the face. In the left picture a bigger part of the face is covered with hair. Furthermore, only in the left picture, the teeth are shown. | |||||
| Another interesting result is the impact of visibility of the face. A expamle is subject nd1S04406, the ROC of this subject can be found in Figure 6. There are a few genuine scores which a relative low. One of these matching scores in the matching score between the pictures in Figure 6. There are a few differences between these pictures. The first is the visibility of the left part of the face. In the left picture a bigger part of the face is covered with hair. Another significate diffent is the visablity of the ears. Furthermore, only in the left picture, the teeth are shown. | |||||
| \begin{figure}[ht] | \begin{figure}[ht] | ||||
| \centering | \centering | ||||
| \includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{image/nd1S04406_ROC} | \includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{image/nd1S04406_ROC} | ||||