\begin{frame}[typeset second]{Case Study} \customslide { %notes \begin{itemize} \item in the case study \item perform and evaluate design method \item The chosen subject of design \item Tweet on a whiteboard writer \item Allowed for complexity \item mainly hardware problem instead of control or software \item Protocol for consistent evaluation \item List of questions \item Before and after each step \end{itemize} } { %overlay \begin{itemize} \item Perform and evaluate design method \item Design \emph{Tweet on a Whiteboard Writer} \item Evaluation Protocol \end{itemize} } \end{frame} \begin{frame}[typeset second]{Initial Design} \customslide { %notes \begin{itemize} \item to make complex \item SCARA + Cable driver carriage \item Order of operation \begin{itemize} \item Scara writes 3 characters \item Carriage is moved \item SCARA can write next 3 characters \item Until Tweet is on the whiteboard \end{itemize} \end{itemize} } { %overlay \begin{block}{Whiteboard Writer} \begin{itemize} \item SCARA \item Cable Driven Carriage \end{itemize} \end{block} \begin{figure} \raggedright \includegraphics[width=60mm]{graphics/combined.pdf} \end{figure} } \end{frame} \begin{frame}[typeset second]{Result} \customslide { %notes \textbf{PRESENT SCARA} \begin{itemize} \item From both the SCARA and the Cable driven carriage I only implemented the SCARA. \item As you can see, it does work. \item The implementation of the SCARA alone gave an enormous amount of feedback on the design method. \item Therefore, the design method should be improved first, before attempting the continuation of the design. \end{itemize} } { %overlay } \end{frame}