|
|
|
@@ -101,8 +101,13 @@ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Evaluation} |
|
|
|
This step was completed without many difficulties. |
|
|
|
Even though it required a revision of the earlier specifications and defining order of operation. |
|
|
|
However, this is an issue with the preparation phase in general, not with this step in particular. |
|
|
|
Which includes the revision of the earlier specifications and definition of orders of operation. |
|
|
|
Indicating that I overlooked details while defining the specifications in \autoref{sec:specifications}. |
|
|
|
According to the design plan as described in \autoref{chap:analysis}, I should go back and review those specifications. |
|
|
|
Followed by reviewing all steps after the specifications. |
|
|
|
However, this complete review is not practical and extremely time consuming. |
|
|
|
The point here is, looking at the evaluations of this and previous steps, that chosen design strategy is not feasible, especially as a novice designer. |
|
|
|
In \autoref{chap:case_evaluation} I will evaluate this with more detail. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the analysis, I expected more specific tests. |
|
|
|
Each test could then be used as a milestone during the development of the system. |
|
|
|
|
