Pārlūkot izejas kodu

Small tweak of evaluation

tags/0.6.0-conclusion
Wouter Horlings pirms 4 gadiem
vecāks
revīzija
934f58b798
1 mainītis faili ar 1 papildinājumiem un 1 dzēšanām
  1. +1
    -1
      content/case_experiment_problem_description.tex

+ 1
- 1
content/case_experiment_problem_description.tex Parādīt failu

@@ -19,4 +19,4 @@ However, it was not expected to be this minimal.
Perhaps the most serious disadvantage is the absence of stakeholders.
Normally, a good problem definition focusses on getting the stakeholders on the same line \autocite{shafaat_exploring_2015}.
However, this case study does only have one stakeholder, the author, defeating the purpose getting everyone on the same line.
Creating a more elaborate problem description would not improve the following design process, but it does cost valuable time.
Creating a more elaborate problem description would not improve the evaluation of the design process, but it does cost valuable time.

Notiek ielāde…
Atcelt
Saglabāt