|
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ |
|
|
|
## Second iteration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Current status of implementation |
|
|
|
The implementation of the end-effector showed us that it was too difficult to implement it in this research. |
|
|
|
That means that it was a good thing we did that as a first step. |
|
|
|
As the End-effector was difficult to implement we have to simplify the design and the SCARA will now hold the marker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Features |
|
|
|
Therefore we are left with two feature we can choose from. |
|
|
|
Furthermore, we lose one test and we have no dependencies anymore. |
|
|
|
Which makes the selection even easier. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Selection table |
|
|
|
We constructed the following table to select a feature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Feature | Dependency | Test Coverage | Risk | Time | Risk/Time factor | |
|
|
|
|--------------|--------------|---------------|--------|--------|------------------| |
|
|
|
| Scara | - | 2 | medium | medium | 1 | |
|
|
|
| Carriage | - | 2 | low | medium | 0.5 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From this we will select the SCARA as the next step for the iteration. |