| @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | |||||
| ## Second iteration | |||||
| ### Current status of implementation | |||||
| The implementation of the end-effector showed us that it was too difficult to implement it in this research. | |||||
| That means that it was a good thing we did that as a first step. | |||||
| As the End-effector was difficult to implement we have to simplify the design and the SCARA will now hold the marker. | |||||
| ### Features | |||||
| Therefore we are left with two feature we can choose from. | |||||
| Furthermore, we lose one test and we have no dependencies anymore. | |||||
| Which makes the selection even easier. | |||||
| ### Selection table | |||||
| We constructed the following table to select a feature. | |||||
| | Feature | Dependency | Test Coverage | Risk | Time | Risk/Time factor | | |||||
| |--------------|--------------|---------------|--------|--------|------------------| | |||||
| | Scara | - | 2 | medium | medium | 1 | | |||||
| | Carriage | - | 2 | low | medium | 0.5 | | |||||
| From this we will select the SCARA as the next step for the iteration. | |||||